https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373569 The judgment directed the provisional release of goods to the second respondent, who would then hand them over to the third respondent. The third respondent assumed liability for statutory obligations, including payment to the petitioner. The court emphasized the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted the importance of preventing future misuse of the Import-Export Code. The arrangement was deemed expedient for this case but not a precedent for future cases. en-us Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373569 The judgment directed the provisional release of goods to the second respondent, who would then hand them over to the third respondent. The third respondent assumed liability for statutory obligations, including payment to the petitioner. The court emphasized the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted the importance of preventing future misuse of the Import-Export Code. The arrangement was deemed expedient for this case but not a precedent for future cases. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373569