https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373564 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected three Revenue's ROM Applications seeking rectification of a Final Order, emphasizing that the repetition of facts in the present order compared to an earlier remanded matter did not constitute a valid ground for rectification. The Tribunal found the applications frivolous, lacking merit, and affirmed that the facts remained consistent. It stressed the importance of identifying substantial errors for rectification and clarified that mere repetition of facts without material change does not justify seeking rectification of a tribunal order. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:38:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373564 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected three Revenue's ROM Applications seeking rectification of a Final Order, emphasizing that the repetition of facts in the present order compared to an earlier remanded matter did not constitute a valid ground for rectification. The Tribunal found the applications frivolous, lacking merit, and affirmed that the facts remained consistent. It stressed the importance of identifying substantial errors for rectification and clarified that mere repetition of facts without material change does not justify seeking rectification of a tribunal order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373564