https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373561 A defendant was entitled to place a rebuttal handwriting expert opinion on record after the plaintiff's expert report had already been accepted. Once the disputed thumb impression had been sent to an expert at the plaintiff's instance and that report was before the trial court, denying the defendant an equal opportunity to file rebuttal evidence was unsustainable. The rejection of the request under Section 151 CPC was set aside, and the defendant was permitted to file the rebuttal handwriting expert report. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373561 A defendant was entitled to place a rebuttal handwriting expert opinion on record after the plaintiff's expert report had already been accepted. Once the disputed thumb impression had been sent to an expert at the plaintiff's instance and that report was before the trial court, denying the defendant an equal opportunity to file rebuttal evidence was unsustainable. The rejection of the request under Section 151 CPC was set aside, and the defendant was permitted to file the rebuttal handwriting expert report. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373561