<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 719 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim for excess service tax paid, citing the one-year limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of payment under a mistaken belief, the Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions, supported by Supreme Court judgments. The Tribunal concluded that the authorities correctly applied the limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 719 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim for excess service tax paid, citing the one-year limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of payment under a mistaken belief, the Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions, supported by Supreme Court judgments. The Tribunal concluded that the authorities correctly applied the limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>