<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 704 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the alleged clandestine removal of duplex paper. Lack of evidence supporting the removal claim, inconsistencies in statements obtained during the investigation, and reliance on planning register entries led to the decision on 11.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 704 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the alleged clandestine removal of duplex paper. Lack of evidence supporting the removal claim, inconsistencies in statements obtained during the investigation, and reliance on planning register entries led to the decision on 11.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>