<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Allows Refund for Konkan Rail Project Consumers; Section 11B&#039;s Unjust Enrichment Bar Ruled Rebuttable Presumption.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43915</link>
    <description>Refund Claim - In the present case the appellants are the consumer of the goods and have utilized the said goods in creation of Konkan Rail Project, for which the adhoc exemption order Of 1994 and the 2002 issued - the bar of unjust enrichment as in Section 11B is not a absolute bar but a rebuttable presumption - refund allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:42:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Allows Refund for Konkan Rail Project Consumers; Section 11B&#039;s Unjust Enrichment Bar Ruled Rebuttable Presumption.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43915</link>
      <description>Refund Claim - In the present case the appellants are the consumer of the goods and have utilized the said goods in creation of Konkan Rail Project, for which the adhoc exemption order Of 1994 and the 2002 issued - the bar of unjust enrichment as in Section 11B is not a absolute bar but a rebuttable presumption - refund allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:42:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>