<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that notices issued under Section 153C were invalid as the Assessing Officer (AO) of the searched person did not record satisfaction before transferring material to the AO of the assessee, and the AO of the assessee did not sign the satisfaction note. Consequently, the assessments under Section 153C with Section 143(3) were quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed. The Tribunal did not address the other grounds on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:03:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that notices issued under Section 153C were invalid as the Assessing Officer (AO) of the searched person did not record satisfaction before transferring material to the AO of the assessee, and the AO of the assessee did not sign the satisfaction note. Consequently, the assessments under Section 153C with Section 143(3) were quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed. The Tribunal did not address the other grounds on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>