<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16300</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal confirmed the initial addition of unaccounted sales and fabrication charges but deleted the enhanced addition. The Tribunal upheld the variation in accounts of certain parties, leading to additional income. The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the legal question on the deletion of enhanced sales addition for adjudication, emphasizing the importance of addressing legal issues arising from Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16300</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal confirmed the initial addition of unaccounted sales and fabrication charges but deleted the enhanced addition. The Tribunal upheld the variation in accounts of certain parties, leading to additional income. The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the legal question on the deletion of enhanced sales addition for adjudication, emphasizing the importance of addressing legal issues arising from Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>