https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278160 The Court dismissed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a delay of 581 days, emphasizing the significance of justifying delays and the importance of the term "sufficient cause." Despite arguments for discretion, the Court found the delay excessive and not adequately explained, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the application was rejected, leading to the disposal of related applications without costs awarded, directing parties to receive the order promptly. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:20:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278160 The Court dismissed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a delay of 581 days, emphasizing the significance of justifying delays and the importance of the term "sufficient cause." Despite arguments for discretion, the Court found the delay excessive and not adequately explained, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the application was rejected, leading to the disposal of related applications without costs awarded, directing parties to receive the order promptly. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278160