<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1635 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278161</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal. The court emphasized that the CIT cannot revise an assessment merely due to a disagreement with the assessing officer, especially if the officer&#039;s decision is based on valid materials and within the scope of the law. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal provisions and the limitations on the CIT&#039;s revisionary powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1635 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278161</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal. The court emphasized that the CIT cannot revise an assessment merely due to a disagreement with the assessing officer, especially if the officer&#039;s decision is based on valid materials and within the scope of the law. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal provisions and the limitations on the CIT&#039;s revisionary powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>