<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 679 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373514</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the detention order of goods due to an incomplete E-Way bill update by directing the petitioner to pay a one-time tax under the CGST Act and SGST Act within four days. Upon payment, the detained goods were to be released immediately, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the matter further before the appropriate authority. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 679 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373514</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the detention order of goods due to an incomplete E-Way bill update by directing the petitioner to pay a one-time tax under the CGST Act and SGST Act within four days. Upon payment, the detained goods were to be released immediately, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the matter further before the appropriate authority. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>