https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373513 The court rejected the petition challenging the detention order, confiscation of goods, and tax penalties under the CGST Act, 2017. It found that the petitioner's arguments were adequately addressed by the Proper Officer, ensuring compliance with the Act. The court held that the issues raised were not suitable for Article 226 jurisdiction, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies for the petitioner. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373513 The court rejected the petition challenging the detention order, confiscation of goods, and tax penalties under the CGST Act, 2017. It found that the petitioner's arguments were adequately addressed by the Proper Officer, ensuring compliance with the Act. The court held that the issues raised were not suitable for Article 226 jurisdiction, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies for the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373513