<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373505</link>
    <description>Imported furniture assessed on a unit basis could not have its declared transaction value enhanced merely because the physical weight found on examination exceeded the weight stated in the invoices and packing lists. The revenue did not dispute the transaction price itself, and the valuation basis was not weight-dependent, so prorata loading of the invoice price had no legal foundation. The valuation enhancement was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373505</link>
      <description>Imported furniture assessed on a unit basis could not have its declared transaction value enhanced merely because the physical weight found on examination exceeded the weight stated in the invoices and packing lists. The revenue did not dispute the transaction price itself, and the valuation basis was not weight-dependent, so prorata loading of the invoice price had no legal foundation. The valuation enhancement was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>