<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 666 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax adjudication matters. The decision set aside the order-in-original due to procedural irregularities and granted the appellants a reasonable opportunity to present their arguments afresh in denovo proceedings, ensuring a fair hearing and upholding the integrity of the adjudicatory process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 666 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in tax adjudication matters. The decision set aside the order-in-original due to procedural irregularities and granted the appellants a reasonable opportunity to present their arguments afresh in denovo proceedings, ensuring a fair hearing and upholding the integrity of the adjudicatory process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>