<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16293</link>
    <description>Amounts set apart towards the molasses storage fund account and molasses storage tank fund account were held to be diverted at source by overriding title and, therefore, excluded from the assessee&#039;s total income. The Madras HC followed its earlier decision on identical facts and treated the relevant sums as not forming part of taxable income because they never accrued to the assessee as its own income. Accordingly, the amounts were not includible in total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16293</link>
      <description>Amounts set apart towards the molasses storage fund account and molasses storage tank fund account were held to be diverted at source by overriding title and, therefore, excluded from the assessee&#039;s total income. The Madras HC followed its earlier decision on identical facts and treated the relevant sums as not forming part of taxable income because they never accrued to the assessee as its own income. Accordingly, the amounts were not includible in total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>