<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 643 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed income, as the disallowance was due to the rate of deduction claimed, which was considered bona fide. The Tribunal referenced relevant case law and concluded that the penalty was not justified. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on 09.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 643 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed income, as the disallowance was due to the rate of deduction claimed, which was considered bona fide. The Tribunal referenced relevant case law and concluded that the penalty was not justified. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on 09.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>