<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 641 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support inaccurate particulars of income and noted a discrepancy in the basis for confirming the penalty by the ld.CIT(A). Citing a similar case, the Tribunal deleted the penalty, concluding that the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 641 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support inaccurate particulars of income and noted a discrepancy in the basis for confirming the penalty by the ld.CIT(A). Citing a similar case, the Tribunal deleted the penalty, concluding that the assessee had not furnished inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>