<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 23 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16276</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Appellate Tribunal to establish clear findings on the chemicals used in the masticating process and the precise nature of the end-product. Only after obtaining these findings, the Tribunal would determine whether the assessee was engaged in manufacturing, thus eligible for the investment allowance under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1985-86.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 23 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16276</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Appellate Tribunal to establish clear findings on the chemicals used in the masticating process and the precise nature of the end-product. Only after obtaining these findings, the Tribunal would determine whether the assessee was engaged in manufacturing, thus eligible for the investment allowance under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1985-86.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>