<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the denial of Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal held that the goods were used for a mix of dutiable and exempted products, justifying the availment of credit. However, the denial of Cenvat Credit on input services for construction activities was upheld as the appellant failed to provide adequate support for the claim, leading to the liability to pay/reverse the credit on those services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the denial of Cenvat Credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal held that the goods were used for a mix of dutiable and exempted products, justifying the availment of credit. However, the denial of Cenvat Credit on input services for construction activities was upheld as the appellant failed to provide adequate support for the claim, leading to the liability to pay/reverse the credit on those services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>