<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 61 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16275</link>
    <description>The court held that the authorities should have treated the declaration as defective rather than invalid, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to rectify it. The writ petition was granted, directing the respondents to provide the petitioner with a chance to correct the defect in the declaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 61 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16275</link>
      <description>The court held that the authorities should have treated the declaration as defective rather than invalid, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to rectify it. The writ petition was granted, directing the respondents to provide the petitioner with a chance to correct the defect in the declaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>