https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373448 A writ challenge to a VAT assessment and consequential demand was not entertained because the petitioner had an effective statutory remedy under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court noted that the petitioner's complaints about non-consideration of replies and later-filed C-Forms could be placed before the Assessing Officer in an application under that provision, where the objections could be examined and appropriate orders passed after hearing the petitioner. No view was expressed on the merits, and the petitioner was given liberty to seek relief under Section 84. The impugned demand was kept in abeyance until orders were passed. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:32:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373448 A writ challenge to a VAT assessment and consequential demand was not entertained because the petitioner had an effective statutory remedy under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court noted that the petitioner's complaints about non-consideration of replies and later-filed C-Forms could be placed before the Assessing Officer in an application under that provision, where the objections could be examined and appropriate orders passed after hearing the petitioner. No view was expressed on the merits, and the petitioner was given liberty to seek relief under Section 84. The impugned demand was kept in abeyance until orders were passed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373448