<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373441</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, finding that its failure to address the fundamental dispute on the character of distribution fees as royalty was an apparent mistake. The Court held that the Tribunal should have decided on the issue itself instead of remanding it. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, directing the appeal to be restored to the Tribunal for fresh disposal without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373441</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, finding that its failure to address the fundamental dispute on the character of distribution fees as royalty was an apparent mistake. The Court held that the Tribunal should have decided on the issue itself instead of remanding it. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, directing the appeal to be restored to the Tribunal for fresh disposal without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>