<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373440</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order allowing rectification, noting the lack of thorough examination in the initial penalty appeal decision. The Court emphasized that penalties can be imposed despite reduced losses, citing relevant case law. The petitioner was permitted to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal on all grounds and raise defenses against the penalty imposition. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:02:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373440</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order allowing rectification, noting the lack of thorough examination in the initial penalty appeal decision. The Court emphasized that penalties can be imposed despite reduced losses, citing relevant case law. The petitioner was permitted to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal on all grounds and raise defenses against the penalty imposition. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>