<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 604 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373439</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, determining that the levy imposed under this section is a fee and not a penalty. The court concluded that the fee serves to regularize delayed filing of TDS returns and is not confiscatory or oppressive. Various judgments were cited to support this decision, and the court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of Section 234E, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 604 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373439</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, determining that the levy imposed under this section is a fee and not a penalty. The court concluded that the fee serves to regularize delayed filing of TDS returns and is not confiscatory or oppressive. Various judgments were cited to support this decision, and the court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of Section 234E, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>