<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16268</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, based on individual ownership of assets by partners of the firm. The court interpreted the term &quot;house&quot; broadly to include structures used for habitation or shelter, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues raised. The decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling and rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments, emphasizing that partners, not the firm, are entitled to claim exemption under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16268</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, based on individual ownership of assets by partners of the firm. The court interpreted the term &quot;house&quot; broadly to include structures used for habitation or shelter, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues raised. The decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling and rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments, emphasizing that partners, not the firm, are entitled to claim exemption under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>