<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 598 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373433</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the new SEZ unit was eligible for exemption under Section 10AA as it was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of the existing business. The appeal was dismissed with no substantial question of law arising for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 598 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373433</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the new SEZ unit was eligible for exemption under Section 10AA as it was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of the existing business. The appeal was dismissed with no substantial question of law arising for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>