<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 596 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373431</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the reassessment notice, the order under section 144/147, and consequential actions. The court directed the concerned authorities to file a report within eight weeks and listed the case for compliance on a specific date. The judgment favored the assessee due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to adhere to prescribed legal procedures, specifically in serving proper notice and following Rule 127 of the Income-tax Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 596 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373431</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the reassessment notice, the order under section 144/147, and consequential actions. The court directed the concerned authorities to file a report within eight weeks and listed the case for compliance on a specific date. The judgment favored the assessee due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to adhere to prescribed legal procedures, specifically in serving proper notice and following Rule 127 of the Income-tax Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>