<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 592 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was unjustified as no income was deemed concealed due to the absence of additions or disallowances during assessment. Additionally, issuing a notice under section 148 to a deceased person was deemed invalid, and legal representatives cannot be penalized for the deceased assessee&#039;s liabilities. Consequently, the penalty imposed was deleted, and the appeal favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 592 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was unjustified as no income was deemed concealed due to the absence of additions or disallowances during assessment. Additionally, issuing a notice under section 148 to a deceased person was deemed invalid, and legal representatives cannot be penalized for the deceased assessee&#039;s liabilities. Consequently, the penalty imposed was deleted, and the appeal favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>