<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 591 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of GBU service charges back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication, directing the assessee to demonstrate the nexus between services provided by the holding company and the subsidiary with demonstrative evidence. The charging of interest under sections 234B/C/D was acknowledged as consequential to the primary issue&#039;s determination. All three appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 591 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of GBU service charges back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication, directing the assessee to demonstrate the nexus between services provided by the holding company and the subsidiary with demonstrative evidence. The charging of interest under sections 234B/C/D was acknowledged as consequential to the primary issue&#039;s determination. All three appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>