<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373420</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude double jeopardy for the assessee. A 12.5% disallowance on profit from bogus purchases was considered just, reducing the gross profit offered by the assessee. The judgment emphasized the need for thorough verification of purchases to uphold fair taxation practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373420</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude double jeopardy for the assessee. A 12.5% disallowance on profit from bogus purchases was considered just, reducing the gross profit offered by the assessee. The judgment emphasized the need for thorough verification of purchases to uphold fair taxation practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>