<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 582 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for proper adjudication, emphasizing the need for a correct assessment in accordance with the law. It clarified that the Assessing Officer in limited scrutiny cases can address claims raised by the assessee to ensure a correct assessment, despite limitations outlined in CBDT Circulars. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment with proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 582 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for proper adjudication, emphasizing the need for a correct assessment in accordance with the law. It clarified that the Assessing Officer in limited scrutiny cases can address claims raised by the assessee to ensure a correct assessment, despite limitations outlined in CBDT Circulars. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment with proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>