<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1653 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278141</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on the factual matrix and the appellant&#039;s concessions regarding certain charges. The issues concerning abatement of expenses and liability to service tax on foreign exchange payments were remanded for further investigation. The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on core documents and borrowed service charges recovered from clients and confirmed the invocation of the extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1653 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278141</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved. The Tribunal&#039;s findings were based on the factual matrix and the appellant&#039;s concessions regarding certain charges. The issues concerning abatement of expenses and liability to service tax on foreign exchange payments were remanded for further investigation. The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on core documents and borrowed service charges recovered from clients and confirmed the invocation of the extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>