<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1758 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all five appeals filed by the assessee, overturning the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the grounds for penalty imposition and highlighted the need for a clear connection between additions and incriminating material seized during searches to justify penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1758 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all five appeals filed by the assessee, overturning the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the grounds for penalty imposition and highlighted the need for a clear connection between additions and incriminating material seized during searches to justify penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>