<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 98 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16264</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the valuation of unquoted shares of a private limited company for wealth tax assessment. The issue was whether advance tax paid under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and shown on the balance-sheet could be deducted when valuing the shares. The Supreme Court ruled that rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, must be followed, disallowing deductions like advance tax. The Court clarified that advance tax should not be considered a liability for valuation purposes, aligning with previous judgments. The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, ruling against the assessee and directing valuation without deducting advance tax, in accordance with rule 1D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:58:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 98 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16264</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the valuation of unquoted shares of a private limited company for wealth tax assessment. The issue was whether advance tax paid under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and shown on the balance-sheet could be deducted when valuing the shares. The Supreme Court ruled that rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, must be followed, disallowing deductions like advance tax. The Court clarified that advance tax should not be considered a liability for valuation purposes, aligning with previous judgments. The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s position, ruling against the assessee and directing valuation without deducting advance tax, in accordance with rule 1D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>