<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 563 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373398</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a 100% EOU manufacturing Twisted Yarn &amp;amp; Fabrics, in appeals against duty demands, penalties, and confiscation of goods. The Appellant&#039;s removal of grey fabrics with fake certificates led to allegations of duty evasion. Despite lower authorities confirming demands and penalties, the tribunal found the Appellant had produced genuine certificates and emphasized the lack of substantial evidence for duty evasion. Discrepancies in duty demands led to the ruling that duty should only apply to finished goods, resulting in the dismissal of confiscation and fines. The impugned order was set aside, allowing both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 563 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373398</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a 100% EOU manufacturing Twisted Yarn &amp;amp; Fabrics, in appeals against duty demands, penalties, and confiscation of goods. The Appellant&#039;s removal of grey fabrics with fake certificates led to allegations of duty evasion. Despite lower authorities confirming demands and penalties, the tribunal found the Appellant had produced genuine certificates and emphasized the lack of substantial evidence for duty evasion. Discrepancies in duty demands led to the ruling that duty should only apply to finished goods, resulting in the dismissal of confiscation and fines. The impugned order was set aside, allowing both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>