<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 562 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373397</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the demand to include the scrap value in the assessable value of exempted goods was not justified as the job work charges already covered the scrap value. The tribunal also ruled that there was no basis to demand duty on the cenvat amount of raw material and criticized the revenue&#039;s valuation method. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 06:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 562 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373397</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the demand to include the scrap value in the assessable value of exempted goods was not justified as the job work charges already covered the scrap value. The tribunal also ruled that there was no basis to demand duty on the cenvat amount of raw material and criticized the revenue&#039;s valuation method. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>