<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373395</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred a case concerning the legality of redetermining the Retail Sale Price (RSP) for periods before the notification of rules under Section 4A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to a larger bench due to conflicting decisions. The core issue was whether RSP could be ascertained before the rules&#039; notification on 1.3.2008. The Tribunal highlighted the procedural nature of the rules and the need for clarity on applying them retrospectively. The case also raised questions about reliance on statements of buyers/dealers and allegations of clandestine clearances, prompting further examination by the larger bench for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373395</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred a case concerning the legality of redetermining the Retail Sale Price (RSP) for periods before the notification of rules under Section 4A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to a larger bench due to conflicting decisions. The core issue was whether RSP could be ascertained before the rules&#039; notification on 1.3.2008. The Tribunal highlighted the procedural nature of the rules and the need for clarity on applying them retrospectively. The case also raised questions about reliance on statements of buyers/dealers and allegations of clandestine clearances, prompting further examination by the larger bench for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>