<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373389</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to accept statutory forms and revise the Central Sales Tax Assessment Order, and refund tax paid, as the Assessing Officer found the Form-F declarations to be bogus. The Court held that the petitioner should have appealed to the Appellate Authority instead of seeking mandamus, as the officer had already made a specific finding on the forms&#039; genuineness. The petitioner was instructed to challenge the officer&#039;s finding through the appropriate appeal process rather than a writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 06:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 554 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373389</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to accept statutory forms and revise the Central Sales Tax Assessment Order, and refund tax paid, as the Assessing Officer found the Form-F declarations to be bogus. The Court held that the petitioner should have appealed to the Appellate Authority instead of seeking mandamus, as the officer had already made a specific finding on the forms&#039; genuineness. The petitioner was instructed to challenge the officer&#039;s finding through the appropriate appeal process rather than a writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>