<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (11) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278132</link>
    <description>An appellate court should reverse an acquittal only for substantial and compelling reasons, with due weight to the trial court&#039;s assessment of witnesses and the reinforced presumption of innocence. The SC held that the oral evidence identifying the accused was unreliable, the alleged dying declarations lacked independent medical support, and surrounding circumstances indicated interpolation and afterthought. It further held that a retracted confession made in police custody cannot sustain conviction without material corroboration, especially when the surrounding evidence contradicts it. On that basis, the reversal of acquittal was unwarranted and the acquittal was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (11) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278132</link>
      <description>An appellate court should reverse an acquittal only for substantial and compelling reasons, with due weight to the trial court&#039;s assessment of witnesses and the reinforced presumption of innocence. The SC held that the oral evidence identifying the accused was unreliable, the alleged dying declarations lacked independent medical support, and surrounding circumstances indicated interpolation and afterthought. It further held that a retracted confession made in police custody cannot sustain conviction without material corroboration, especially when the surrounding evidence contradicts it. On that basis, the reversal of acquittal was unwarranted and the acquittal was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>