<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 551 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373386</link>
    <description>The petition was disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation before the concerned authority. The authority was directed to consider the representation and pass a speaking order after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The operative effect is that the dispute was not adjudicated on merits in the proceedings, and further consideration was left to the competent authority through a reasoned administrative decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 551 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373386</link>
      <description>The petition was disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation before the concerned authority. The authority was directed to consider the representation and pass a speaking order after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The operative effect is that the dispute was not adjudicated on merits in the proceedings, and further consideration was left to the competent authority through a reasoned administrative decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>