<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 33 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16249</link>
    <description>The Finance Act, 1990 retrospectively inserted clause (iiia) into section 28 and expanded section 2(24), bringing sale proceeds from import licences within chargeability as business income. As a result, the controversy over whether receipts from transfer of import entitlements were assessable as business income no longer survived for adjudication. The Delhi High Court therefore treated the referred question as academic and returned the reference unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 33 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16249</link>
      <description>The Finance Act, 1990 retrospectively inserted clause (iiia) into section 28 and expanded section 2(24), bringing sale proceeds from import licences within chargeability as business income. As a result, the controversy over whether receipts from transfer of import entitlements were assessable as business income no longer survived for adjudication. The Delhi High Court therefore treated the referred question as academic and returned the reference unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>