<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 76 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16247</link>
    <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled against an assessee-company seeking investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the company&#039;s data processing activities did not qualify as manufacturing or production activities as required by the Act. Despite the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that data processing constituted manufacturing, the Court disagreed, emphasizing the lack of tangible article production. Citing a Supreme Court case, the Court concluded that processed data did not meet the Act&#039;s criteria. Consequently, the Court denied the investment allowance claim, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 76 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16247</link>
      <description>The High Court of BOMBAY ruled against an assessee-company seeking investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the company&#039;s data processing activities did not qualify as manufacturing or production activities as required by the Act. Despite the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that data processing constituted manufacturing, the Court disagreed, emphasizing the lack of tangible article production. Citing a Supreme Court case, the Court concluded that processed data did not meet the Act&#039;s criteria. Consequently, the Court denied the investment allowance claim, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>