<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders due to being passed on a non-existent entity and ruled that certain areas like service area, window projections, cupboard projections, and flower bed areas should not be included in the built-up area calculation for Section 80IB(10) deduction. The revenue appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment orders due to being passed on a non-existent entity and ruled that certain areas like service area, window projections, cupboard projections, and flower bed areas should not be included in the built-up area calculation for Section 80IB(10) deduction. The revenue appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>