<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373364</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for re-examination. The assessee failed to establish the genuineness of transactions before the Ld. AO, but additional evidence was not confronted to the AO, violating natural justice. The tribunal emphasized the need for the assessee to substantiate their position, directing them to support their case for a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373364</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for re-examination. The assessee failed to establish the genuineness of transactions before the Ld. AO, but additional evidence was not confronted to the AO, violating natural justice. The tribunal emphasized the need for the assessee to substantiate their position, directing them to support their case for a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>