<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16246</link>
    <description>For valuing gifted shares under the break-up value method, the balance-sheet nearest to the date of gift governs the computation, so the later balance-sheet as on 31 March 1974 was preferred over the earlier one as on 31 March 1973. Provision for gratuity was treated as an ascertained liability and therefore deductible while arriving at total assets for break-up value; it could not be ignored as a contingent item. The valuation rule thus depends on the nearest relevant balance-sheet date, with gratuity provision allowed as a liability in the asset computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16246</link>
      <description>For valuing gifted shares under the break-up value method, the balance-sheet nearest to the date of gift governs the computation, so the later balance-sheet as on 31 March 1974 was preferred over the earlier one as on 31 March 1973. Provision for gratuity was treated as an ascertained liability and therefore deductible while arriving at total assets for break-up value; it could not be ignored as a contingent item. The valuation rule thus depends on the nearest relevant balance-sheet date, with gratuity provision allowed as a liability in the asset computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>