<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 517 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373352</link>
    <description>An ex parte order was recalled where the applicant had not been given notice of hearing or intimation that the appeal had been transferred from Delhi to Chandigarh. The absence was treated as a result of lack of communication, and the applicant therefore could not appear when the matter was listed. The Registry was directed to list the appeal for final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 517 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373352</link>
      <description>An ex parte order was recalled where the applicant had not been given notice of hearing or intimation that the appeal had been transferred from Delhi to Chandigarh. The absence was treated as a result of lack of communication, and the applicant therefore could not appear when the matter was listed. The Registry was directed to list the appeal for final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>