<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PMLA Applies to Pre-Enactment Assets: Not Automatically Exempt from &quot;Proceeds of Crime&quot; Classification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43842</link>
    <description>The contention that assets acquired prior to enactment of the PMLA could never fall under the scope of the definition of the expression ‘proceeds of crime’ and consequently are immune from the provisions of the PMLA, is erroneous and is accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:33:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PMLA Applies to Pre-Enactment Assets: Not Automatically Exempt from &quot;Proceeds of Crime&quot; Classification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43842</link>
      <description>The contention that assets acquired prior to enactment of the PMLA could never fall under the scope of the definition of the expression ‘proceeds of crime’ and consequently are immune from the provisions of the PMLA, is erroneous and is accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:33:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>