<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 511 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on services provided from the Tata Car Service Centre, Worli, Mumbai, and under Business Auxiliary Services. The demands related to reimbursements to Authorized Dealers and Banking &amp;amp; Financial Services were remanded for redetermination. Penalties were upheld, but their quantum needed redetermination. The Commissioner was directed to adjudicate the matter within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 511 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on services provided from the Tata Car Service Centre, Worli, Mumbai, and under Business Auxiliary Services. The demands related to reimbursements to Authorized Dealers and Banking &amp;amp; Financial Services were remanded for redetermination. Penalties were upheld, but their quantum needed redetermination. The Commissioner was directed to adjudicate the matter within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>