<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving irregular transfer of cenvat credit during factory premises shifting. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s decision unsustainable as it exceeded the show-cause notice&#039;s scope, proposing recovery under different legal provisions. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements and ensuring demands align with show-cause notice proposals. The appellant&#039;s compliance with procedural requirements was acknowledged, leading to the appeal being allowed for a de novo order after due consideration of all relevant factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving irregular transfer of cenvat credit during factory premises shifting. The Tribunal found the original authority&#039;s decision unsustainable as it exceeded the show-cause notice&#039;s scope, proposing recovery under different legal provisions. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of following procedural requirements and ensuring demands align with show-cause notice proposals. The appellant&#039;s compliance with procedural requirements was acknowledged, leading to the appeal being allowed for a de novo order after due consideration of all relevant factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>