<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 492 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373327</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the review petition was condoned, allowing the Court to examine the review on merits. Applying the limited scope of review jurisdiction, the SC found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order dismissing the special leave petition. As the materials produced did not disclose any ground for interference, the review petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 492 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373327</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the review petition was condoned, allowing the Court to examine the review on merits. Applying the limited scope of review jurisdiction, the SC found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order dismissing the special leave petition. As the materials produced did not disclose any ground for interference, the review petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>